No. Trump admin is full of anti-Semites. Here's a article from Jan 30, 2017
The White House statement on Holocaust Remembrance day did not mention Jews or antisemitism. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... al/514974/
Holocaust denial is alive and well in the highest offices of the United States. It is being spread by those in President Trump’s innermost circle. It may have all started as a mistake by a new administration that is loath to admit it’s wrong. Conversely, it may be a conscious attempt by people with anti-Semitic sympathies to rewrite history. Either way it is deeply disturbing.
Okay. Well, you worry about the amorphous conspiratorial stuff and I'll worry about all the blatant and proven ways this administration is fucking over this country, this planet, and the world.
Edited because I suck at spelling.
Rooster wrote:
I hunt with a handgun.
pieceofme wrote:
Yeah, Mojo is a lot of peoples favourite!
Mojo wrote:
Okay. Well, you worry about the amorphous conspiratorial stuff and I'll worry about all the blatant and proven ways this administration is fucking over this country, this planet, and the world.
Edited because I suck at spelling.
Not really talking about a conspiracy. They're not taking action to rewrite WW II history. It's merely the alt right culture leaking out, comparable to a Freudian slip where someone accidentally exposes what they really believe.
I think Bannon was put in place as a political negging tactic. We're now seeing the second phase where the outrage over having an alt-right super villain in such high position now subsides as Trump begins to lower him back down the ladder. Everybody breathes easier, maybe even grudgingly commending Trump for coming around on it. Meanwhile nothing has really changed and we still have a shitshow in the white house.
I wouldn't be surprised if Bannon knew how things would play out all along.
The news was on at the gym and the report on CNN was saying that the US and Russia might be at its lowest point in terms of dealings with each other because of the missiles deployed in Syria. Tillerson is over there now talking to Putin. FFS, does anyone actually believe this shit about tension between the two sides? This is theater.
Between this idiot and the Conway broad, Drumpf's got himself a nice crew delivering the stupid on a daily basis...
Also nice of Eric to help paint a bulls eye on Ivanka by giving her the credit for the decision on the Tomahawk missile launch on Syrian..
I suspect he's always been jealous of her.
But I also suspect that he's too dumb to realize what he's even saying...much like his father.
There's apparently behind-the-scenes footage from "The Apprentice" of Trump the elder mercilessly mocking Eric for being stupid. I mean Tiffany was apparently a Hillary supporter but agreed to do some stumping for her dad by request of her mom (or so I've been told). Outside of Ivanka, who knows how those kids really feel about Donald?
Pierce Foreskin wrote:We just dropped the "mother of all bombs" in Afghanistan.
The GBU-43 has 11tons of explosives, the biggest bomb that isn't a nuke.
Hey why have them if we don't use em, right?
USA USA USA
This is deeply concerning. One step closer to full-on nuclear weapons. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't Congress usually have to authorize this stuff?
As some people suggested in one comments section, this feels like Trump's dry run for a nuclear launch, maybe to gradually get the public amped up for that occurrence, or maybe it's a show of strength to Putin. The response, which was not wholly negative, to his attack on Syria may have also amped up Trump's own thirst for this kind of thing.
Pierce Foreskin wrote:We just dropped the "mother of all bombs" in Afghanistan.
The GBU-43 has 11tons of explosives, the biggest bomb that isn't a nuke.
Hey why have them if we don't use em, right?
USA USA USA
This is deeply concerning. One step closer to full-on nuclear weapons. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't Congress usually have to authorize this stuff?
As some people suggested in one comments section, this feels like Trump's dry run for a nuclear launch, maybe to gradually get the public amped up for that occurrence, or maybe it's a show of strength to Putin. The response, which was not wholly negative, to his attack on Syria may have also amped up Trump's own thirst for this kind of thing.
Yeah, with Trump bigger is better. So this very well could be a dry run.
Every lady needs a Prince Albert in her Can
UtahRatt wrote:
You either like Zappa or you like taking it up the ass with anal beads the size of a plum.
Pierce Foreskin wrote:We just dropped the "mother of all bombs" in Afghanistan.
The GBU-43 has 11tons of explosives, the biggest bomb that isn't a nuke.
Hey why have them if we don't use em, right?
USA USA USA
This is deeply concerning. One step closer to full-on nuclear weapons. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't Congress usually have to authorize this stuff?
As some people suggested in one comments section, this feels like Trump's dry run for a nuclear launch, maybe to gradually get the public amped up for that occurrence, or maybe it's a show of strength to Putin. The response, which was not wholly negative, to his attack on Syria may have also amped up Trump's own thirst for this kind of thing.
Yeah, with Trump bigger is better. So this very well could be a dry run.
The Republican holdouts better step and start handling this Trump problem. It will be a disaster, to use that dummy's favorite word, if he starts playing with nukes like a kid with a sparkler on the 4th of July.
TenBenny wrote:This is deeply concerning. One step closer to full-on nuclear weapons. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't Congress usually have to authorize this stuff?
LMFAO @ "one step closer to full-on nuclear weapons."
Trump White House to keep its visitor logs secret, citing privacy and national security concerns: https://t.co/ux9XTklNaX
Aaaaaaaaaaaaand the tweet complaining about such activity from Obama
“If they get rid of Bannon, you know what’s gonna happen? The motherlode. If Bannon is removed, there are gonna be divorces, because I know about the mistresses, the sugar babies, the drugs, the pill popping, the orgies. I know everything,” said Cernovich.
“If they go after Bannon, the mother of all stories is gonna drop, and we’re just gonna destroy marriages, relationships—it’s gonna get personal.”
“If they get rid of Bannon, you know what’s gonna happen? The motherlode. If Bannon is removed, there are gonna be divorces, because I know about the mistresses, the sugar babies, the drugs, the pill popping, the orgies. I know everything,” said Cernovich.
“If they go after Bannon, the mother of all stories is gonna drop, and we’re just gonna destroy marriages, relationships—it’s gonna get personal.”
Sounds like they hired Drew "Freight Train" Sherman to head their legal team...
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/ ... vk1tf.html
Former foreign minister Gareth Evans has launched a scathing attack on Donald Trump, urging Australia to reduce its dependence on the US alliance and accept China as a legitimate "global rule maker".
Mr Evans labelled Mr Trump as "manifestly the most ill-informed, under-prepared, ethically challenged and psychologically ill-equipped president in US history".
The former senior member of the Hawke and Keating Labor governments also called on the government to put "more bucks" into defence spending, potentially including nuclear-powered submarines, to be more self-reliant.
