The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Moderator: Metal Sludge
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Roger is past his shelf life. Pack it in old timer
Total Package
- Hatchets Molly
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2552
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2022 1:16 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Never cared much for The Who except for Tommy, so couldn't watch the whole video. I bounced after seeing the frontman (yes, I know who he is) with a coffee cup and cool hand towel around his neck. JFC. Daltrey is effing 81. Take it easy, dude.
- Anthrax442
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 7771
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Such a bitch move on Daltrey's part. Zak clearly will be fine.
They should have retired 40 years ago when they said they were gonna.
They should have retired 40 years ago when they said they were gonna.

MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.
- NineteenEightyFour
- Playing at a Friend's Party
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:20 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Obviously "having a mood". The guy played with Keith Moon, one of the wildest drummers in rock.
- FreddyFender
- Debut Album Goes Gold
- Posts: 3995
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:36 am
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
One of the most un-rock and roll things in the history of the movement.
Perfect example of living long enough to see yourself become the villain.
Perfect example of living long enough to see yourself become the villain.
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
So are you saying the band should have died before they got old?Anthrax442 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:10 am Such a bitch move on Daltrey's part. Zak clearly will be fine.
They should have retired 40 years ago when they said they were gonna.
Sleek wrote: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a shredder to write a great song.
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 2:43 am
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Someone needs to tell Roger that if it's too loud, you're too old.
- NineteenEightyFour
- Playing at a Friend's Party
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:20 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
He hoped he died before he got there, but that didn't play out.ALMOSTsaved wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:30 am Someone needs to tell Roger that if it's too loud, you're too old.
- Anthrax442
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 7771
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Niceeeeee.GoodJudge wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:26 amSo are you saying the band should have died before they got old?Anthrax442 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:10 am Such a bitch move on Daltrey's part. Zak clearly will be fine.
They should have retired 40 years ago when they said they were gonna.

MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
This is just so odd.
I can see throwing a mini-tantrum at the drummer in the moment, but to ultimately blame him for what's a monitor/stage set up/lack of soundcheck/you're old and deaf issue is silly.
Also, that would've been a perfect song to do an impromptu piano/guitar/vocals-only rendition of.
Get through it, buy a drum shield, and move on.
Of course that screams "deeper issue/straw that broke the camels back", but who knows.
I can see throwing a mini-tantrum at the drummer in the moment, but to ultimately blame him for what's a monitor/stage set up/lack of soundcheck/you're old and deaf issue is silly.
Also, that would've been a perfect song to do an impromptu piano/guitar/vocals-only rendition of.
Get through it, buy a drum shield, and move on.
Of course that screams "deeper issue/straw that broke the camels back", but who knows.
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:58 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
What would a drum shield help?aznsquirt wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 11:44 am This is just so odd.
I can see throwing a mini-tantrum at the drummer in the moment, but to ultimately blame him for what's a monitor/stage set up/lack of soundcheck/you're old and deaf issue is silly.
Also, that would've been a perfect song to do an impromptu piano/guitar/vocals-only rendition of.
Get through it, buy a drum shield, and move on.
Of course that screams "deeper issue/straw that broke the camels back", but who knows.
It's an electronic kit, it makes no sound.
Any sound from the drums comes from the mixing desk in Roger's in ear monitors. If it was too loud, that is on the sound engineer.
Apparently Pete does not use in ears, but monitors.
If those were too loud, then again, not zakks fault, but either Pete's, since he is half deaf and needs more volume to hear the monitor or, again, the sound engineer pumping too much volume.
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Hahahaha, thanks for pointing that out, I didn't catch that. That makes it that much funnier and more ridiculous.
-
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 18071
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:39 am
- Location: North Dakota
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Starkly is visually cueing someone on the side stage to turn him up at the beginning of the clip. Dide the sound engineer screw this whole thing up or was Starkey set up to be the fall guy during a live performance with a bunch of deaf guys who should’ve retired 25 years ago?
Everyone Is Someone Else's Bitch
- AlexVonHaig
- Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
- Posts: 1654
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:21 am
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Are we forgetting that if Zak murdered someone during this show he would be less of a criminal that the lead guitar player
- Hatchets Molly
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2552
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2022 1:16 pm
-
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
To what are you referring?AlexVonHaig wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:57 am Are we forgetting that if Zak murdered someone during this show he would be less of a criminal that the lead guitar player
- TheDeadBastard
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:16 pm
- Location: 3rd level of hell
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Pete’s “research”.DangerZone wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:06 pmTo what are you referring?AlexVonHaig wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:57 am Are we forgetting that if Zak murdered someone during this show he would be less of a criminal that the lead guitar player


- HueyRamone
- Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
- Posts: 33984
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:07 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
An even more un rock and roll thing is Roger singing like ass, fucking up, quitting the song like a bitch, whining about the not-at-fault drummer......and the audience cheers him!!FreddyFender wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:00 am One of the most un-rock and roll things in the history of the movement.
Perfect example of living long enough to see yourself become the villain.
Fuck, there's not anything they wont swallow and clamor for more.
LAglamrocker wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
-
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
I thought he said he was writing a book reportTheDeadBastard wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:23 pmPete’s “research”.DangerZone wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:06 pmTo what are you referring?AlexVonHaig wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:57 am Are we forgetting that if Zak murdered someone during this show he would be less of a criminal that the lead guitar player
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Is that an electronic kit that looks like a real kit? And the way he stops and talks to Pete totally screams that he didn't want Ringo's kid in the first place.
"bus problems come on man so boring we have our bus its awesome and we r watching judge judy on it right now tour is going great 14 more shows to go see you out there rockin peeps not you garbageman you stay home" - HueyRamone, 7/3/12
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:58 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Yeah, the kit looks like a real kit just for optics.
One of their techs did a blog on the rehearsals and even there Roger was complaining about the drums.
The tech said it made no sense since it was an electronic kit and made no sound.
They finally figured out it was because Pete does not want to use in ears monitors and had a monitor wedge for drums and one for guitars.
The monitor with the drums was what was bothering Daltrey. The tech says they fixed it in rehearsal by pointing the monitor in a different direction.
My guess is this fell apart during the actual show since Pete is half deaf and likely had his monitor wedge with the drums turned up and pointed different again.
In any case, that is an electronic drumkit and the kit itself makes no more sound than someone tapping on the couch....
Here ya go:
Pete is the only one who doesn’t use the in-ear monitors; he uses the “wedges” slanted speaker boxes that sit onstage. I may have told you about his setup, which IS unique to him, and quite brilliant. He stands in the middle of a box of four wedge monitors. In the two speakers in front of him, he hears his and the band’s vocals, plus his own acoustic guitar signal. Behind him on the left, is the playback of the tracks like ‘Baba O’Riley’ and ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ – his own synth/organ tapes from countless Who shows. And in the rear/right monitor speaker (between himself and the drums) he has the sound of the drums and bass, so when he’s looking at Zak, he hears the drums from that same direction. During rehearsals this weekend, Roger kept hearing “too much drums” despite the lack of any REAL drums onstage (Zak’s pads are rubber/plastic and don’t really make much noise.) Eventually it was determined that Rog was hearing too much of Pete’s rear/right wedge, which is somewhat near him. But Pete needs the drums/bass to drive him, always. We did a lot of moving things and baffles so the drum speaker can still be loud enough for Pete, but it blocks any sound of that speaker from Roger, who has his own drum mix. These are significant changes that won’t be noticible by anyone watching the show, but it may make a huge difference in the feeling and outcome for the musicians onstage. This is why we rehearse!
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Aaaaaaaaaaaand…Zak is back.
- Venus Flytrap
- Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
- Posts: 1751
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
First, Zak should have told them to fuck off when they asked him back. Second ,ok if he says "I'll come back," fine. That statement from Pete wouldn't cut it for me with that all sides were at fault bullshit. I'd want a public apology from Roger.
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
In three days Zak Starkey rose again, in fulfillment of the scriptures.
- Anthrax442
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 7771
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
This. What a clownshow for a band that's been around for sixty years, you'd think they'd know how to make a proper public statement.Venus Flytrap wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:20 am First, Zak should have told them to fuck off when they asked him back. Second ,ok if he says "I'll come back," fine. That statement from Pete wouldn't cut it for me with that all sides were at fault bullshit. I'd want a public apology from Roger.
The fact that Pete made it and not Roger is ridiculous, and still seems to point blame at Zak.

MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.
-
- Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 7:16 pm
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
He’s likely getting compensated enough to be less concerned about the rest of it, and his price probably just went up.Venus Flytrap wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:20 am First, Zak should have told them to fuck off when they asked him back. Second ,ok if he says "I'll come back," fine. That statement from Pete wouldn't cut it for me with that all sides were at fault bullshit. I'd want a public apology from Roger.
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
The band has 2 scheduled shows and considering how little prep went into the 2 Royal Albert Hall shows I doubt Pete wants to go thru the work of breaking in and getting used to playing with a new drummer. Basically Roger proposes the gigs and Pete decides if he is going to play then shows up and plays. If he says no then it's a Roger solo tour. Roger has had complete creative control of all things The Who going back about 15-20 years.
"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest
https://www.youtube.com/@ijwthstd/videos
https://www.youtube.com/@ijwthstd/videos
- exitflagger
- Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
- Posts: 26945
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:48 pm
- Location: Taking in the 4AM show at the Clark
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Is he in the band or out?
Last I heard was OUT but a few minutes have passed and paw paw might've woke in a new world today.
Last I heard was OUT but a few minutes have passed and paw paw might've woke in a new world today.


Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Roger apparently never wanted Kenny Jones in the band either. I for one liked Kenny’s drumming live on the old songs.
- Anthrax442
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 7771
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: The performance that got Zak Starkey fired from The Who after 29 years
Zak said he was out. Said that they wanted him to basically lie about what happened, and he wasn't having it, and that he was happy with the fact that he'd played with them for 29 years.exitflagger wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 9:54 am Is he in the band or out?
Last I heard was OUT but a few minutes have passed and paw paw might've woke in a new world today.
I think he sees the writing on the wall that this last tour is going to be a shit show, and it's not worth the trouble to put up with those guys.

MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.