Machado wrote:Gritt wrote:I've already thoroughly owned your retarded ass on first round quarterbacks and their success winning championships. It was a fact based owning and you not admitting it shows that you are truly in need of help with simple comprehension. I'm done with you. Back to picking lettuce for you.
but did you win the debate about the play call last night or
my knowledge of the 46D??
**waiting for your next excuse**
3, 2, 1..........
I just read back at all your yapping over the 46D, the wild cat and you sound like a nub that just wasted hours on google.
The 46D was so great! Hey dumb ass, great is Richard Dent, Singletary, Perry, Wilber Marshall, Hampton and Otis.......It's your personnel dip shit. Run the 46DDDDDD with the 1985 Buc's Roster and they give up more point then the 2013 Denver Broncos scored if not more.
Run the west coast offensive with bad TE's or RB's who can't catch....Play a full zone with a with Man to Man CB's or a shitty Safety and you get burned all day long.
You have to match your Defense or Offense with your personnel or it's not going to work no matter what. You can't just run the 46D and call it great, you need OLB's and Beef up the middle.
------------------The best example
Nnamdi Asomugha was ranked one of the best CB's during his Raider years, the Eagles gave up bank and put him in a Zone and Nnamid Asomugha was totally lost burnt toast. He didn't have a clue when to leave or stick his zone and was never heard from again.
-----------------
That Wild Cat play was a gimmick that didn't fool anyone, it was a stupid fucking call, Bell got hit behind the line and arms on him but odd's are you're not going to stop him from getting a yard anyway.
Any coach with a brain would have ran a sneak with Vick or a dive with Bell, the only two plays fast enough where you could put the ball in the endzone or call a time out if you don't. Calling a fade or a cross would have been instantly expected by the CB's and sat on. But out of the Wild Cat is was a clear run that didn't fool the D. Look at their D formation, they was ready for it. It wasn't gutsy it was foolish, so Bell got a 1yd TD. What's the odds. It was stupid because it was an unnecessary risk.
--------------------
Variations of THE ZONE are the most basically used and taught defensive from Pop on up. When you get to the Pro's you can't do it without the players.
Seattle's D is simple, they traded and drafted players who could play zone and and ended up with Great Players who can play Zone.
Raider's D is basically the same as Seattle's and they're one of the worst units in the NFL. Woodson is a good cover Safety but can't come up and tackle like Kam Chancellor. The Raiders are Weak at the CB position which is why they switched to zone to make it easier "I'm guessing" but they still suck and can't cover their ZONE or when they Man Up. They don't have the skill or the communication to work as a unit.
So enough with how great the 46D is when it was the players who dominated.
Enough with the West cost when it's easy if you have the hands to catch
All you've proved is your knowledge comes from scouring the internet reading football for dummies and other peoples interpretations without actually understanding dick. That is funny, you boasting about is hilarious.