Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Moderator: Metal Sludge
- pieceofme
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22484
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
- Location: Downtown Vancouver
Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Killers or Iron Maiden?
Iron Maiden by quite a distance for me
Iron Maiden by quite a distance for me

GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH
Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
- mullet_head
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 3382
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:45 am
- Location: Algarve, Portugal
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Same for me.
It's actually the only IM album where I won't skip any track.

- kytepunches
- Doing Package Tours in Theaters
- Posts: 5238
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: America’s snowy Hat
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
I went with the S/T also . It’s got no real filler tracks on it. Though ,I have been listening to the complete version of Maiden Japan the most .
- Love_Industry
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 18647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
- Location: Zasransk, Belarus
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Killers and it's not even close. Sanctuary and Running Free are the only good tracks on the s/t, the rest is just... bland. Remember how disappointed I was when I had Killers and NotB and a ticket to the upcoming Piece of Mind tour and finally got to hear the s/t at a friend's. Couldn't believe it was the same band.
Edit. Keep forgetting Remember Tomorrow which is good. Maybe because I listened a lot more to it as a live b-side from NotB with Bruce.
Edit. Keep forgetting Remember Tomorrow which is good. Maybe because I listened a lot more to it as a live b-side from NotB with Bruce.
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
There's no Maiden album without filler.
S/T has Charlotte and Iron Maiden
Killers has Twilight Zone, Prodigal Son (although that solo section almost saves it) and Drifter
Both fantastic albums though.
S/T has Charlotte and Iron Maiden
Killers has Twilight Zone, Prodigal Son (although that solo section almost saves it) and Drifter
Both fantastic albums though.
- Love_Industry
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 18647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
- Location: Zasransk, Belarus
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Correct. 7th Son MAY be an exception, but on the other hand there's no real standout track on it.
I don't think any song on there became one of their must-play live tunes either.
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
- Love_Industry
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 18647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
- Location: Zasransk, Belarus
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
There's only two albums between 7th Son and when Bruce left. So what you are saying is that they played The Clairvoyant on the 7th Son, No Prayer and Fear of the Dark tours.BernieTaupson wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 12:51 am
They also played the shit out of The Clairvoyant for years up until Bruce left. Sounded shit in the Gers era.
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Holy shit, never realised! Statistics from setlist.fm for the 7th Son album:BernieTaupson wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 12:51 am
They also played the shit out of The Clairvoyant for years up until Bruce left. Sounded shit in the Gers era.
The Evil That Men Do (866)
The Clairvoyant (680)
Can I Play With Madness (403)
It must be because of the bassintro, right? Fuckin Harris.
- Psychobolia.com
- Playing a Package Tour in Arenas
- Posts: 13463
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:17 am
- Location: Paris, France, land of sleaze and cheese, wine and whine
- Contact:
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
I love Remember Tomorrow, but I went with Killers.
Better songs, better production, better cover (marginally!).
Better songs, better production, better cover (marginally!).
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
I was thinking about how the first three are comparable to the original Star Wars trilogy.
Iron Maiden = Star Wars. New, exciting, game-changer, instantly popular, inspired a thousand copycats.
Killers = Empire. Developing the theme. Slower and more thoughtful than the the flashy, in-your-face debut.
NOTB = ROTJ. No Ewoks were harmed in the making of that album but it was definitely the start of Iron Maiden the brand, which eventually took over from Iron Maiden the band. Brand consolidation included replacing the "punky" singer with a traditional heavy metal wailer.
Others can debate if that makes Blaze = Jar Jar.
I voted Killers, BTW.
Iron Maiden = Star Wars. New, exciting, game-changer, instantly popular, inspired a thousand copycats.
Killers = Empire. Developing the theme. Slower and more thoughtful than the the flashy, in-your-face debut.
NOTB = ROTJ. No Ewoks were harmed in the making of that album but it was definitely the start of Iron Maiden the brand, which eventually took over from Iron Maiden the band. Brand consolidation included replacing the "punky" singer with a traditional heavy metal wailer.
Others can debate if that makes Blaze = Jar Jar.
I voted Killers, BTW.
Sleek wrote: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a shredder to write a great song.
- pieceofme
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22484
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
- Location: Downtown Vancouver
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
I do have to admit the killers cover is better.Psychobolia.com wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 3:31 am I love Remember Tomorrow, but I went with Killers.
Better songs, better production, better cover (marginally!).

GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH
Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
- Demon Kogure
- Playing Frat Parties
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 6:22 pm
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
"Phantom of the Opera" is bland?!Love_Industry wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:06 pm Sanctuary and Running Free are the only good tracks on the s/t, the rest is just... bland.
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Neither. Nor do I know how to use chatgpt like whoever is behind that a/c.BernieTaupson wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 4:04 amAre you an Italian KISS fan?GoodJudge wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 4:02 am I was thinking about how the first three are comparable to the original Star Wars trilogy.
Iron Maiden = Star Wars. New, exciting, game-changer, instantly popular, inspired a thousand copycats.
Killers = Empire. Developing the theme. Slower and more thoughtful than the the flashy, in-your-face debut.
NOTB = ROTJ. No Ewoks were harmed in the making of that album but it was definitely the start of Iron Maiden the brand, which eventually took over from Iron Maiden the band. Brand consolidation included replacing the "punky" singer with a traditional heavy metal wailer.
Others can debate if that makes Blaze = Jar Jar.
I voted Killers, BTW.
Sleek wrote: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a shredder to write a great song.
- pieceofme
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22484
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
- Location: Downtown Vancouver
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Yeah no kidding. But I'm used to Love_Industry living in bizarro world.Demon Kogure wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 5:55 am"Phantom of the Opera" is bland?!Love_Industry wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:06 pm Sanctuary and Running Free are the only good tracks on the s/t, the rest is just... bland.

GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH
Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
- Danzig in the Dark
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22355
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:39 pm
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
GoodJudge wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 4:02 am I was thinking about how the first three are comparable to the original Star Wars trilogy.
Iron Maiden = Star Wars. New, exciting, game-changer, instantly popular, inspired a thousand copycats.
Killers = Empire. Developing the theme. Slower and more thoughtful than the the flashy, in-your-face debut.
NOTB = ROTJ. No Ewoks were harmed in the making of that album but it was definitely the start of Iron Maiden the brand, which eventually took over from Iron Maiden the band. Brand consolidation included replacing the "punky" singer with a traditional heavy metal wailer.
Others can debate if that makes Blaze = Jar Jar.
I voted Killers, BTW.
Janick Binks wrote: Meesa jump around and collect paycheck.


Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Close call. The Star Wars analogy is a good one. I would also compare them to Ride the Light and Master of Puppets. Sister albums with the latter being a slightly deeper and more mature version of the former. In this case I voted Killers although I prefer RTL over MoP
- Anthrax442
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 7775
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Killers is their best album, period. But I can see why people would vote for self titled, there are some classics on there.

MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Guessing I'm in the vast minority, but I never got the love for those 2 albums. They're fine, but what followed just blew those out of the water.
I did love Pauls voice on those (and still prefer it to Bruce) There was just something missing with the songwriting that they figured out with NOTB
I did love Pauls voice on those (and still prefer it to Bruce) There was just something missing with the songwriting that they figured out with NOTB
- Bono Nettencourt
- Headlining a Theater Tour
- Posts: 6150
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm
- Love_Industry
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 18647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
- Location: Zasransk, Belarus
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Adrian and Bruce started writing songs.
And later influenced Harris - Aces High sounds like Harris writing a Smith/Dickinson song and doing a great job on it.
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Killers by a decent margin but I love 'em both.
- Gibsonite
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 8174
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 5:03 pm
- Location: Hiding in Honduras
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
S/T has some great songs and attitude, but Killers has great songs with one of metal's tastiest guitarists in Adrian Smith playing on them. Also, Purgatory is the greatest thing they've ever done. Listened to both at work today along with Maiden Japan, that band was a fucking monster.

- Psychobolia.com
- Playing a Package Tour in Arenas
- Posts: 13463
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:17 am
- Location: Paris, France, land of sleaze and cheese, wine and whine
- Contact:
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
No, the vast majority preferred and purchased Number / Piece / Powerslave, myself included!daveg wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 10:19 am Guessing I'm in the vast minority, but I never got the love for those 2 albums. They're fine, but what followed just blew those out of the water.
I did love Pauls voice on those (and still prefer it to Bruce) There was just something missing with the songwriting that they figured out with NOTB
Personally, I prefer Bruce's voice, it's just deeper and more powerful. No one wins the Paul vs Bruce debate, it's just a matter of personal taste. (Someone wins the Bruce/Paul vs Blaze debate, though)
As for the songwriting, indeed, they kicked it up a massive notch on Number. Those were the glorious days when bands would give it their all for 8 or 9 killer songs instead of 11 or 13 lesser-quality songs. Blame it on the CD format!
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
S/T easily. Killers is average.
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Both great, but definitely Killers for me.
Great sounding production and better songs.
And for the record: Twilight Zone is NOT filler! It's a great hooky, punky song!
Great sounding production and better songs.
And for the record: Twilight Zone is NOT filler! It's a great hooky, punky song!
- mullet_head
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 3382
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:45 am
- Location: Algarve, Portugal
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
He does have some stupid takes. Fuck that guy, he ruined this thread.pieceofme wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:04 amYeah no kidding. But I'm used to Love_Industry living in bizarro world.Demon Kogure wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 5:55 am"Phantom of the Opera" is bland?!Love_Industry wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:06 pm Sanctuary and Running Free are the only good tracks on the s/t, the rest is just... bland.
Well maybe not ruined, but it sure took a turn for the worse after he posted.

-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:11 pm
- Location: Dead Moines, IA
Re: Which Paul Di'Anno Iron Maiden album is better?
Iron Maiden
"Moving on, is a simple thing...what it leaves behind is hard. You know the sleeping feel no more pain...and the living all are scarred." -- Megadeth's "A Tout Le Monde"