I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

User avatar
Chip Z'Hoy
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 30694
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Between here and there

I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Chip Z'Hoy »

Nirvana talking about Metallica:

https://youtu.be/61A4MmK6vDk?si=EQvWSww97OXFS6Eu

They brought up an interesting point: Metallica helped bring the Misfits to the mainstream. That's how I first heard of them, the Garage Days EP.

It's always been my position that Nirvana opened the jar but a shit-ton of other bands helped loosen it: Metallica, R.E.M., Jane's Addiction, Faith No More, Ministry, Soundgarden, Primus, etc.

And who got that ball rolling? GUNS N' ROSES. Cobain would never admit it, but Guns N' Roses... I guess opened the door to the kitchen where the jar was? I really painted myself into a corner with this jar thing.
User avatar
killeverything
A Drinking Fan With A Baseball Problem
Posts: 10835
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Camp Crystal Lake

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by killeverything »

Metallica changed everything. Nirvana was a pop band at the right time.

Music ( especially rock/hard rock/metal ) was needing a change. Nirvana put the nail in the coffin, but Metallica put the bullet in the head.

It was Metallica that inspired crossover. Metallica that bridged the gap between punk and metal...moreso than GBH and Discharge. Metallica that embraced skate culture. Metallica that neutered the TuffTrixters, fucking Stryper did an album where they tried to act tough ( they were on the cover in prison stripes )...that was after Metallica ( I never heard it though, because it's Stryper ). A lot of the prancy bands started changing their sound after Metallica was starting to break.

It was Metallica that didn't dress up in stage clothes ( originally ), It was Metallica that brought Misfits ( as you pointed out ) and Motorhead ( in the states at least ) to mainstream conscience.

Metallica changed everything. As much as or almost as much as The Ramones.

Nirvana was in the right place at the right time.
Image
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4773
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by DangerZone »

killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:18 pm …but Metallica put the bullet in the head.
you sure about that?
User avatar
killeverything
A Drinking Fan With A Baseball Problem
Posts: 10835
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Camp Crystal Lake

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by killeverything »

DangerZone wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:23 pm
killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:18 pm …but Metallica put the bullet in the head.
you sure about that?
I am.
Image
User avatar
dmbrocker
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18992
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:49 pm
Location: Rockin’ with Amber, Bradie, Laurine, Dokken, Ratt, Motley, Aerosmith, Rush, Poison…

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by dmbrocker »

killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:33 pm
DangerZone wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:23 pm
killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:18 pm …but Metallica put the bullet in the head.
you sure about that?
I am.
If we're talking Black Album, I agree. That album is the one that pretty much changed the whole game.
Image
LAglamrocker wrote: Trixter is awesome but everyone has seen After The Rain video correct? That’s one of first things I’m going thank God for
User avatar
killeverything
A Drinking Fan With A Baseball Problem
Posts: 10835
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Camp Crystal Lake

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by killeverything »

dmbrocker wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:41 pm
killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:33 pm
DangerZone wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:23 pm

you sure about that?
I am.
If we're talking Black Album, I agree. That album is the one that pretty much changed the whole game.

True, but an argument could be made their impact was starting to really be felt Master/AJFA, at least in non-mainstream ways. Zorlac Skateboards, Crimson Ghost shirts, Suicidal Tendencies sound change, etc. The Black Album blew it up.
Image
User avatar
Chip Z'Hoy
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 30694
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Between here and there

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Chip Z'Hoy »

dmbrocker wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:41 pmIf we're talking Black Album, I agree. That album is the one that pretty much changed the whole game.
Co-signing everything Kill said, and this too.

In my head, Metallica were outselling Nirvana by a lot but the RIAA is saying Nevermind was 5x platinum by the end of '93 (pre-shotgun numbers) and The Black Album was 7x platinum. In the same ballpark, sales-wise. (Or CERTIFICATION-wise, rather. Don't need one of these Johnny Showbiz types correcting me.)

But once you factor in Metallica's massive tour versus Nirvana shooting dope and barely performing until In Utero, Metallica were definitely the bigger band. (Now that I'm reading what I wrote, I don't think anyone's ever said Nirvana was bigger so I don't know what my point is. :lol: )

In terms of merch, no contest. Nowadays, it might be a close race, with Nirvana basically being a clothing brand now, but in the early 90's, nobody touched Metallica with t-shirts. EVERY kid at my school had one. (I had the white Justice shirt with the faces on the front and the four albums on the back.)
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10514
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Wiseacre »

All Metallica did was become huge and bring thrash metal out of the underground briefly. It was quickly apparent that one Metallica was enough though for the casual music fan and zero other thrash bands even came close to their popularity or financial success. Thrash in the underground was on its last leg shortly after that with death metal taking over the underground.

Metallica didn’t change much unlike Nirvana, who along with other similar bands brought an entire wave of “grunge” success to the mainstream with lots and lots of copycats and success. You didn’t see ANY real Metallica copycats because there just wasn’t a place for them or a demand. Major labels TRIED with a few of the more popular “B” level thrash bands but it was nowhere near the success grunge was. Thrash just never appealed to nearly as wide an audience (mainly the female half of the world). If Metallica’s success did anything it basically ruined some great thrash bands who after getting picked up by the majors hoping for Black Album success largely sold out and/or were then dropped when it didn’t happen. Thrash was basically dead within a couple years. Metallica were a very successful fluke, although it shouldn’t have happened to any other band but them. They were the top of the heap and earned their place.

As far as the crossover comments, Metallica didn’t do as much as some people think. Crossover was already a thing with bands like Cro-Mags, C.O.C., Agnostic Front and DRI. All before the Garage Days EP. And Metallica just basically “metalized” punk tunes, but they never sounded punk themselves. They were never “crossover”. Suicidal was only actual “punk” for the first album and started to do the “metal” thing by the 2nd album. Hell, early Voivod is more punky than anything Metallica ever did.
User avatar
Fat_Elvis
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 8632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:24 am
Location: In The Poolhouse

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Fat_Elvis »

MTV decided who heard what.
User avatar
Chip Z'Hoy
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 30694
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Between here and there

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Chip Z'Hoy »

Fat_Elvis wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:28 pm MTV decided who heard what.
Yes and no. King Buzzo of the Melvins always says (paraphrasing) "The music didn't sell because it was good; it sold because it was played on MTV 50 times a day. If you play anything 50 times a day, it's going to sell."

I kind of agree? That's true if the band is Nirvana or Stone Temple Pilots. If MTV played "Honey Bucket" by the Melvins 50 times a day, it for sure would've sold more records for them, but not Nirvana numbers.

Wiseacre made a lot of great points about thrash at the time--Metallica was definitely the most commercial out of all of them. "Creeping Death" is on classic rock radio now! It wasn't enough for, say, Exodus or Testament to slow down and become more melodic, they just didn't have that mainstream appeal. (Love both of those bands, btw.)

Or take "Foreclosure of a Dream." Okay song. Definitely Megadeth going more commercial. But put "Sad But True" next to it and you got one song that's an obvious commercial rock song and one that's the #6 Skullcrusher.
User avatar
killeverything
A Drinking Fan With A Baseball Problem
Posts: 10835
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Camp Crystal Lake

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by killeverything »

Wiseacre wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:10 pm
As far as the crossover comments, Metallica didn’t do as much as some people think. Crossover was already a thing with bands like Cro-Mags, C.O.C., Agnostic Front and DRI. All before the Garage Days EP. And Metallica just basically “metalized” punk tunes, but they never sounded punk themselves. They were never “crossover”. Suicidal was only actual “punk” for the first album and started to do the “metal” thing by the 2nd album. Hell, early Voivod is more punky than anything Metallica ever did.
When I said inspired crossover. I didn't mean that Metallica were crossover or even punk, I meant that in that time when they were starting to be known in the underground they bridged the gap between punk and metal. Especially with skate culture embracing them. I still think they are what inspired it. This is what happened after them and before Garage Days re...

ST went thrash with the addition of Rocky ('86), DRI with crossover ( '87 ), Agnostic Front, and Cro-Mags I've always thought of as hardcore, not just a punk band playing thrash since they weren't. COC had a couple good hardcore albums...went straight thrash ( after Metallica blew up ) and became whatever horrible band they are now.
Image
User avatar
Chip Z'Hoy
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 30694
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Between here and there

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Chip Z'Hoy »

I had a Metallica/Zorlac skateboard!

Metallica definitely had that punk/metal crossover appeal. Slayer too.

Is there any other way to say that? Because they weren't a crossover band like S.O.D. or Agnostic but they CROSSED OVER.

What if C-A-T really spelled "dog"?
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10514
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Wiseacre »

killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 9:14 pm
Wiseacre wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:10 pm
As far as the crossover comments, Metallica didn’t do as much as some people think. Crossover was already a thing with bands like Cro-Mags, C.O.C., Agnostic Front and DRI. All before the Garage Days EP. And Metallica just basically “metalized” punk tunes, but they never sounded punk themselves. They were never “crossover”. Suicidal was only actual “punk” for the first album and started to do the “metal” thing by the 2nd album. Hell, early Voivod is more punky than anything Metallica ever did.
When I said inspired crossover. I didn't mean that Metallica were crossover or even punk, I meant that in that time when they were starting to be known in the underground they bridged the gap between punk and metal. Especially with skate culture embracing them. I still think they are what inspired it. This is what happened after them and before Garage Days re...

ST went thrash with the addition of Rocky ('86), DRI with crossover ( '87 ), Agnostic Front, and Cro-Mags I've always thought of as hardcore, not just a punk band playing thrash since they weren't. COC had a couple good hardcore albums...went straight thrash ( after Metallica blew up ) and became whatever horrible band they are now.
DRI were playing “crossover” music before they released an album called “crossover”. Fast beats and metal riffs were all over Dealing With It (and the EP to a lesser extent). I was right in the middle of that scene and even though Metallica covered a couple punk tunes (in their own metal style) I don’t know anyone who considered them punk or being a bridge between the 2 scenes at all. Metallica were not really even appreciated by the punks (skaters aside I guess thanks to Pushead). Not like Motörhead or even Slayer, for example. Metal guys I knew loved punk bands with metal riffs like Corrosion, Crumbsuckers, Agnostic Front and CroMags the only difference between those bands and metal bands was their lyrics and how they looked. It was pretty common for punk and hardcore bands to turn more “metal” once their chops got better. That’s what happened with Suicidal. Even my band were considered crossover early-on since we were mainly a thrash band, but lyrically were more like punk and we weren’t all typical long haired metal heads. We toured with DRI, opened for CroMags, Danzig, Biohazard and Corrosion (technocracy-era) with no issues. And also supported Megadeth, Mercyful Fate, Overkill, Dearh and many other metal bands also with no issues.

IMO, if any band deserves credit for crossing punk and metal (in the mainstream), it was ANTHRAX, not METALLICA. Technically, S.O.D. and then Dan Lilker doing Nuclear Assault did a lot more for that movement than Metallica did and those bands were known for it.
Last edited by Wiseacre on Fri Jan 24, 2025 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Van Ailin'
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3558
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:08 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Van Ailin' »

In between Metallica and Nirvana's success, the increasing sales of Jane's Addiction, REM, and Red Hot Chili Peppers (and even Primus) had a LOT to do with the 90s music shift.
User avatar
SterileEyes1
Doing Package Tours in Theaters
Posts: 5186
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:53 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by SterileEyes1 »

Chip Z'Hoy wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 5:46 pm
It's always been my position that Nirvana opened the jar but a shit-ton of other bands helped loosen it: Metallica, R.E.M., Jane's Addiction, Faith No More, Ministry, Soundgarden, Primus, etc.

And who got that ball rolling? GUNS N' ROSES. Cobain would never admit it, but Guns N' Roses... I guess opened the door to the kitchen where the jar was? I really painted myself into a corner with this jar thing.

This part about GN’R is exactly right. And then Axl brought Faith No More and Soundgarden out on some of their earliest tours, and I believe he wanted to do the same with NIN, NWA, and…Nirvana.

It’s hard to portion it out but if Nirvana gets half the credit for the early 90s shift I think Metallica and GN’R split most of the other half.
My Video Covers: https://www.youtube.com/@therealjeffstein/

"Diary Of A Madman"
"Aja"
"I’m Bad, I’m Nationwide”
“Sludge Factory”
"Locomotive"

My Original Music: https://jeffstein.bandcamp.com
User avatar
Love_Industry
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18647
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Zasransk, Belarus

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Love_Industry »

SterileEyes1 wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:36 am
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 5:46 pm
It's always been my position that Nirvana opened the jar but a shit-ton of other bands helped loosen it: Metallica, R.E.M., Jane's Addiction, Faith No More, Ministry, Soundgarden, Primus, etc.

And who got that ball rolling? GUNS N' ROSES. Cobain would never admit it, but Guns N' Roses... I guess opened the door to the kitchen where the jar was? I really painted myself into a corner with this jar thing.

This part about GN’R is exactly right. And then Axl brought Faith No More and Soundgarden out on some of their earliest tours, and I believe he wanted to do the same with NIN, NWA, and…Nirvana.

It’s hard to portion it out but if Nirvana gets half the credit for the early 90s shift I think Metallica and GN’R split most of the other half.
I would also agree with this but Metallica was more of a shift than GnR who were basically Mötley meets Aerosmith at least until the UYI tour. Which started the same year Nirvana made it to MTV.

Pearl Jam doesn't get enough credit by the way, maybe they weren't as cool as Nirvana and nobody in the band killed himself but Ten came out around the same time as Nevermind and sold Diamond with 2-3 big singles. RHCP also had a big 1991 album that brought a new sound to the mainstream.

And don't forget that Guns, Metallica, Aerosmith and VH had hugely successful album/tour cycles throughout Nirvana's career 91-94. The worst years for classic rock and metal were after Nirvana, not during.
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
User avatar
WolfgangVonPage
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 2:51 pm
Location: At the best damn party at the rim of Hell

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by WolfgangVonPage »

Wiseacre wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 10:29 pm
killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 9:14 pm
Wiseacre wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:10 pm
As far as the crossover comments, Metallica didn’t do as much as some people think. Crossover was already a thing with bands like Cro-Mags, C.O.C., Agnostic Front and DRI. All before the Garage Days EP. And Metallica just basically “metalized” punk tunes, but they never sounded punk themselves. They were never “crossover”. Suicidal was only actual “punk” for the first album and started to do the “metal” thing by the 2nd album. Hell, early Voivod is more punky than anything Metallica ever did.
When I said inspired crossover. I didn't mean that Metallica were crossover or even punk, I meant that in that time when they were starting to be known in the underground they bridged the gap between punk and metal. Especially with skate culture embracing them. I still think they are what inspired it. This is what happened after them and before Garage Days re...

ST went thrash with the addition of Rocky ('86), DRI with crossover ( '87 ), Agnostic Front, and Cro-Mags I've always thought of as hardcore, not just a punk band playing thrash since they weren't. COC had a couple good hardcore albums...went straight thrash ( after Metallica blew up ) and became whatever horrible band they are now.
DRI were playing “crossover” music before they released an album called “crossover”. Fast beats and metal riffs were all over Dealing With It (and the EP to a lesser extent). I was right in the middle of that scene and even though Metallica covered a couple punk tunes (in their own metal style) I don’t know anyone who considered them punk or being a bridge between the 2 scenes at all. Metallica were not really even appreciated by the punks (skaters aside I guess thanks to Pushead). Not like Motörhead or even Slayer, for example. Metal guys I knew loved punk bands with metal riffs like Corrosion, Crumbsuckers, Agnostic Front and CroMags the only difference between those bands and metal bands was their lyrics and how they looked. It was pretty common for punk and hardcore bands to turn more “metal” once their chops got better. That’s what happened with Suicidal. Even my band were considered crossover early-on since we were mainly a thrash band, but lyrically were more like punk and we weren’t all typical long haired metal heads. We toured with DRI, opened for CroMags, Danzig, Biohazard and Corrosion (technocracy-era) with no issues. And also supported Megadeth, Mercyful Fate, Overkill, Dearh and many other metal bands also with no issues.

IMO, if any band deserves credit for crossing punk and metal (in the mainstream), it was ANTHRAX, not METALLICA. Technically, S.O.D. and then Dan Lilker doing Nuclear Assault did a lot more for that movement than Metallica did and those bands were known for it.
Wiseacre, which band were you in?
Man I wish I could have seen Mercyful Fate and Suicidal Tendencies.
Got myself a Cadillac, but can't afford the gasoline.
User avatar
Mister Freeze
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:11 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Mister Freeze »

Nevermind peaked with its first single, then petered off.

By comparison, the Black Album was like a boulder rolling down a hill, picking up more momentum as its run continued. Same was true for Ten.

Generally speaking, metal bands did well in 1991/1992 as long as they left the hairspray, makeup and spandex at home: Metallica, Ozzy, Queensryche, Megadeth, even Tesla to an extent.

Gn'R too, but they were losing cool factor for a variety of reasons.
skunklovestiger wrote: A comment like this needs a really useless piece of shit. Well maybe you are used to get fucked by your mother in the basement. It would be better if somebody just kills you useless asshole. Just killl yourself shithead.
User avatar
Chip Z'Hoy
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 30694
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Between here and there

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Chip Z'Hoy »

Mister Freeze wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 2:39 pm Nevermind peaked with its first single, then petered off.

By comparison, the Black Album was like a boulder rolling down a hill, picking up more momentum as its run continued. Same was true for Ten.
True about Nevermind. I remember "Lithium" being played every hour on MTV for an entire summer and then almost never seeing "In Bloom."

"Sliver" got re-released that winter and I don't think I saw it once. (I think the first time I saw that video was after he died.)

This is a good point people tend to forget: "Teen Spirit" might be the shot heard 'round the world but by the end of 1992, the Nirvana spell was kinda wearing off.

Pearl Jam, meanwhile, were just climbing the entire time. They stopped making videos but MTV had that Unplugged to cherrypick from.

As far as overall cultural presence goes, 1992-1993 was more about Pearl Jam and the Chili Peppers than Nirvana. That's how I remember it, anyway.
User avatar
Mister Freeze
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:11 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Mister Freeze »

A friend of mine worked in a record store at the time. I remember him holding up the CD single for "Come As You Are" and saying, "this is doing okay, but nothing like this" and held up the "Teen Spirit" single.
skunklovestiger wrote: A comment like this needs a really useless piece of shit. Well maybe you are used to get fucked by your mother in the basement. It would be better if somebody just kills you useless asshole. Just killl yourself shithead.
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10514
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Wiseacre »

WolfgangVonPage wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 2:04 pm
Wiseacre, which band were you in?
Man I wish I could have seen Mercyful Fate and Suicidal Tendencies.
Anacrusis. We toured with MF when they reunited in 1993. But I was also lucky enough to see them in 1984 for Don’t Break the Oath. I stood right in front of KD the whole show and it was epic. Full original lineup.
daveg
Doing Package Tours in Theaters
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:19 am

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by daveg »

This is actually one of the more interesting topics in a while.

Not sure I'd agree with Metallica shifting the music scene..more along the lines of keeping hard rock going, That album was a monster and was gonna be massive regardless of year. They were about as popular as anyone before they released it. They just went more mainstream.

The opening riff to Teen Spirit changed everything. The dark video in a gym, the pounding drums. Then comes PJ with Alive and Even flow. Heavy riffs and some awesome videos. They were the ones that pushed all the hair farmers to the flannel and the "woe is me" lyrics. That eventually turned STP, Alice, Soundgarden, Pumpkins into household names. Not sure GnR, Metallica, even Bon Jovi etc had anything to do with that. They were just the cream of the rock crop and were gonna keep going regardless.

I remember our High School changed almost overnight. People still liked Metallica etc, but that had nothing to do with the popularity of the grunge bands.
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2446
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by aznsquirt »

daveg wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:18 pm This is actually one of the more interesting topics in a while.
It is, and I keep reading thinking "man this is interesting, but I have nothing to contribute".

But it did make me wonder when the term "Alternative" went mainstream. By the mid 90s the two main sections in any record store were "R&B" and "Alternative", and some tipping point where every band wanted to be classified as Alternative if they wanted to sell.
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2446
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by aznsquirt »

daveg wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:18 pm This is actually one of the more interesting topics in a while.
It is, and I keep reading thinking "man this is interesting, but I have nothing to contribute".

But it did make me wonder when the term "Alternative" went mainstream. By the mid 90s the two main sections in any record store were "R&B" and "Alternative", and some tipping point where every band wanted to be classified as Alternative if they wanted to sell.
Wiseacre wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:41 pm Anacrusis. We toured with MF when they reunited in 1993. But I was also lucky enough to see them in 1984 for Don’t Break the Oath. I stood right in front of KD the whole show and it was epic. Full original lineup.
Currently blasting the Screams and Whispers album. This crushes.
Last edited by aznsquirt on Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10514
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Wiseacre »

aznsquirt wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:49 pm But it did make me wonder when the term "Alternative" went mainstream.
U2 or maybe REM if you consider that although U2 were definitely alternative or “college” rock before Joshua Tree, they did have some pretty big exposure prior to that with a few early songs.

REM were always considered alternative (style-wise) even after hey blew up.
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10514
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Wiseacre »

aznsquirt wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:52 pm
daveg wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:18 pm This is actually one of the more interesting topics in a while.
It is, and I keep reading thinking "man this is interesting, but I have nothing to contribute".

But it did make me wonder when the term "Alternative" went mainstream. By the mid 90s the two main sections in any record store were "R&B" and "Alternative", and some tipping point where every band wanted to be classified as Alternative if they wanted to sell.
Wiseacre wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:41 pm Anacrusis. We toured with MF when they reunited in 1993. But I was also lucky enough to see them in 1984 for Don’t Break the Oath. I stood right in front of KD the whole show and it was epic. Full original lineup.
Currently blasting the Screams and Whispers album. This crushes.
Thank you. Thank you very much.

If you like that, check out my 2nd solo album from 2021. It's very similar, but even more song-oriented.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... Q3YCurp5Jx
User avatar
Bono Nettencourt
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6168
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Bono Nettencourt »

Chip Z'Hoy wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:00 pm
Mister Freeze wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 2:39 pm Nevermind peaked with its first single, then petered off.

By comparison, the Black Album was like a boulder rolling down a hill, picking up more momentum as its run continued. Same was true for Ten.
True about Nevermind. I remember "Lithium" being played every hour on MTV for an entire summer and then almost never seeing "In Bloom."

"Sliver" got re-released that winter and I don't think I saw it once. (I think the first time I saw that video was after he died.)

This is a good point people tend to forget: "Teen Spirit" might be the shot heard 'round the world but by the end of 1992, the Nirvana spell was kinda wearing off.

Pearl Jam, meanwhile, were just climbing the entire time. They stopped making videos but MTV had that Unplugged to cherrypick from.

As far as overall cultural presence goes, 1992-1993 was more about Pearl Jam and the Chili Peppers than Nirvana. That's how I remember it, anyway.
Correct. In Utero was a relative commercial stiff that barely cleared platinum til Blowbrains fired the 2nd shot heard round the world.
veritas wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 3:37 pm Wow, late to this thread, but Sleek is pulling a Moggio here.

It's absolutely idiotic to contend Zep weren't A-listers in the 1970s.
User avatar
Love_Industry
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18647
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Zasransk, Belarus

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Love_Industry »

Bono Nettencourt wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:08 pm
Correct. In Utero was a relative commercial stiff that barely cleared platinum til Blowbrains fired the 2nd shot heard round the world.
So basically Nirvana was the grunge Twisted Sister to Pearl Jam and Soundgarden's Bon Jovi and Mötley....
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
HoldenSSV
Showcasing for A&R Reps
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2023 5:39 am
Location: Buckeye Nation

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by HoldenSSV »

killeverything wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:18 pm
Metallica changed everything. As much as or almost as much as The Ramones.
The Ramones? Bullshit. They didn't change anything and were a glorified gimmick that went on way too long. Back in the day nobody took them seriously. If they say it now, they're fucking lying.
"Copying off of one person is called plagiarism.
Copying off of ten people is called research."
Neil Diamond Dave
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:32 am

Re: I think Metallica had more to do with music shifting in the early 90's than Nivarna

Post by Neil Diamond Dave »

Yes, great topic. I agree with all of your posts here. I often wondered about the true slow funeral for Hair Metal. I do think GnR were the start of it. But even before, I remember looking for alts to the mainstream and Thrash was it with that Punk influence - I remember picking up Metallica's Master of Puppets and Slayer's Reign In Blood which were so extreme back then, and thinking, Hair Metal is going to die soon.

For me, if I can trace back to my teenage preferences starting to veer away from the mainstream Hair Metal:

Metallica's Master of Puppets
Slayer's Reign in Blood

Then:

GnR's Appetite
Jane's Addiction's Nothing Shocking
Soundgarden's Louder Than Love
Faith No More's Real Thing
Nirvana's Nevermind
Post Reply